States and democratic development in O'Donnell's thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v12i42.2018.386Keywords:
Development, democracy, Latin America, multilevel governance.Abstract
Since the middle of the last century, Guillermo O'Donnell was consolidated as one of the first political scientists to systematically identify the characteristics of the authoritarian Latin American States, what he called the bureaucratic-authoritarian State. With this, he contributed to the beginning of the demystification of authoritarian states in Latin America. These contributions by O'Donnell were gradually assimilated by the literature on the democratic development of Latin America. At the same time, new conceptualizations and lines of research were created. The objective of this article is to give an account of the trajectory of O'Donnell's political work on Latin America to link it with the latest trends in the field and highlight how it could serve as a guide for new governance challenges in the region.
Downloads
References
ANSALDI, WALDO, LA DEMOCRACIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA: ¿UN BARCO A LA DERIVA?, MÉXICO, FONDO DE CULTURA ECONÓMICA, 2007.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO, EL FUTURO DE LA DEMOCRACIA, MÉXICO, FONDO DE CULTURA ECONÓMICA, 2005.
BOBBIO, NORBERTO, LIBERALISMO Y DEMOCRACIA, MÉXICO, FONDO DE CULTURA ECONÓMICA, 2010.
COLLIER, DAVID, “OVERVIEW OF THE BUREAUCRATIC AUTHORITARIAN MODEL”, EN DAVID COLLIER (ED.), THE NEW AUTHORITARIANISM IN LATIN AMERICA, PRINCETON, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1979.
ESQUIVEL, GERARDO, “DESIGUALDAD EXTREMA EN MÉXICO: CONCENTRACIÓN DEL PODER ECO- NÓMICO Y POLÍTICO”, REPORTE DE OXFAM MÉXICO, NÚM. 23, 2015
GASPARINI, LEONARDO Y LUSTIG, NORA, “RISE AND FALL OF INCOME INEQUALITY IN LATIN AME- RICA”, CEDLAS, 2011.
GOÑI, EDWIN, LÓPEZ, HUMBERTO Y SERVEN, LUIS, FISCAL REDISTRIBUTION AND INCOME IN- EQUALITY IN LATIN AMERICA, BANCO MUNDIAL, 2008.
HAAGH, LOUISE, CITIZENSHIP, LABOUR MARKETS AND DEMOCRATIZATION: CHILE AND THE MO- DERN SEQUENCE, NUEVA YORK, SPRINGER, 2002.
HARBERS, IMKE, “TAXATION AND THE UNEQUAL REACH OF THE STATE: MAPPING STATE CAPACITY IN ECUADOR”, GOVERNANCE, VOL. 28, NÚM. 3.
HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT, “THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF IMPORT-SUBSTITUTING INDUSTRIALIZATION IN LATIN AMERICA”, THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, VOL. 82, NÚM. 1.
HOOGHE, LIESBET & MARKS, GARY, “A POSTFUNCTIONALIST THEORY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: FROM PERMISSIVE CONSENSUS TO CONSTRAINING DISSENSUS”, BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL. 39, NÚM. 1.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL, THE THIRD WAVE: DEMOCRATIZATION IN THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY, VOL. 4, OKLAHOMA, UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA PRESS, 1993.
HUNTINGTON, SAMUEL, ORDEN POLÍTICO EN LAS SOCIEDADES EN CAMBIO, MÉXICO, TAURUS, 1996.
JESSOP, BOB, THE STATE: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE, CAMBRIDGE, POLITY PRESS, 2015. KAUFMAN, ROBERT, “INDUSTRIAL CHANGE AND AUTHORITARIAN RULE IN LATIN AMERICA: A CONCRETE REVIEW OF THE BUREAUCRATIC-AUTHORITARIAN MODEL”, EN DAVID COLLIER (ED.), THE NEW AUTHORITARIANISM IN LATIN AMERICA, PRINCETON, PRINCETON
UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1979. LEFTWICH, ADRIAN, “DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT: IS THERE INSTITUTIONAL INCOMPATIBI-
LITY?” DEMOCRATISATION, VOL. 12, NÚM. 5. LI, QUAN Y REUVENY, RAFAEL, “ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION AND DEMOCRACY: AN EMPIRICAL
ANALYSIS”, BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003. MIGDAL, JOEL, STATE IN SOCIETY: STUDYING HOW STATES AND SOCIETIES TRANSFORM AND
CONSTITUTE ONE ANOTHER, CAMBRIDGE, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2001.
MISHKIN, FREDERIC, “LESSONS FROM THE TEQUILA CRISIS”, JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, VOL. 23, NÚM. 10.
O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “TENSIONS IN THE BUREAUCRATIC-AUTHORITARIAN STATE AND THE QUESTION OF DEMOCRACY”, EN DAVID COLLIER (ED.), THE NEW AUTHORITARIANISM IN LATIN AMERICA, PRINCETON, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1979.
O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “ESTADO, DEMOCRATIZACIÓN Y CIUDADANÍA”, REVISTA NUEVA SO- CIEDAD, NÚM. 128.
O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “DELEGATIVE DEMOCRACY”, JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, VOL. 5, NÚM. 1. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “ILUSIONES SOBRE LA CONSOLIDACIÓN”, NUEVA SOCIEDAD, VOL. 144. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, POLYARCHIES AND THE (UN)RULE OF LAW IN LATIN AMERICA, ESTA-
DOS UNIDOS, LASA, 1998. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “DEMOCRACY, LAW, AND COMPARATIVE POLITICS”, STUDIES IN COM-
PARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, VOL. 36, NÚM. 1. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “ACERCA DEL ESTADO EN AMÉRICA LATINA CONTEMPORÁNEA: DIEZ
TESIS PARA DISCUSIÓN”, EN LA DEMOCRACIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA. PNUD. BOGOTÁ,
DC, 2004. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF AGENCY”, EN GUILLERMO O’DONNELL, CU-
LLEL & IAZZETTA (EDS.), THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS,
INDIANA, NOTRE DAME PRESS, 2004. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “HACIA UN ESTADO DE Y PARA LA DEMOCRACIA”, EN RODOLFO MARIA-
NI (COORD.), DEMOCRACIA/ESTADO/CIUDADANÍA: HACIA UN ESTADO DE Y PARA LA
DEMOCRACIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA, ESTADOS UNIDOS, PNUD, 2007. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “ALGUNAS REFLEXIONES ACERCA DE LA DEMOCRACIA, EL ESTADO Y SUS
MÚLTIPLES CARAS”, REVISTA DEL CLAD REFORMA Y DEMOCRACIA, VOL. 42. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, DEMOCRACIA, AGENCIA Y ESTADO: TEORÍA CON INTENCIÓN COMPA-
RATIVA, BUENOS AIRES, PROMETEO, 2010. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, “REVISANDO LA DEMOCRACIA DELEGATIVA”, CASA DEL TIEMPO,
VOL. 31, 2010. O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO & SCHMITTER, PHILIPPE, TRANSITIONS FROM AUTHORITARIAN RULE: TEN-
TATIVE CONCLUSIONS ABOUT UNCERTAIN DEMOCRACIES, ESTADOS UNIDOS, JOHN HOP-
KINS UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2013. O’GORMAN, EDMUNDO, LA INVENCIÓN DE AMÉRICA, MÉXICO, FONDO DE CULTURA ECONÓMI-
CA, 1958. OSZLAK, OSCAR Y O’DONNELL, GUILLERMO, ESTADO Y POLÍTICAS ESTATALES EN AMÉRICA LATINA:
HACIA UNA ESTRATEGIA DE INVESTIGACIÓN, BUENOS AIRES, CLACSO, 1981. PANIZZA, FRANCISCO, CONTEMPORARY LATIN AMERICA: DEVELOPMENT AND DEMOCRACY BE-
YOND THE WASHINGTON CONSENSUS, LONDRES, ZED BOOKS, 2009. PNUD, LA DEMOCRACIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA: HACIA UNA DEMOCRACIA DE CIUDADANAS Y
CIUDADANOS, PERÚ, PNUD, 2004. TILLY, CHARLES Y ARDANT, GABRIEL, THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STATES IN WESTERN EUROPE, NUEVA JERSEY, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1975.
ESQUIVEL, GERARDO, “DESIGUALDAD EXTREMA EN MÉXICO: CONCENTRACIÓN DEL PODER ECO- NÓMICO Y POLÍTICO”, REPORTE DE OXFAM MÉXICO, NÚM. 23.
WIARDA, HOWARD, THE SOUL OF LATIN AMERICA: THE CULTURAL AND POLITICAL TRADITION, NEW HAVEN, YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003.
WIARDA, HOWARD Y KLINE, HARVEY, LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT, BOULDER, WESTVIEW PRESS, 2013.
WILSON, ROBERT, WARD, PETER, SPINK, PETER & RODRÍGUEZ, VICTORIA, GOVERNANCE IN THE AMERICAS. DESCENTRALIZATION, DEMOCRACY, AND SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN
BRAZIL, MEXICO, AND THE USA, INDIANA, UNIVERSITY OF NOTREDAME, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Revista IUS, published by the Legal Sciences Institute of Puebla A.C., is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
We authorize collaborators to upload a copy of their published work on their personal websites or any Open Access repository, provided that Revista IUS is specifically cited as the original source, indicating the year and issue of the respective example and adding the link to the webpage on which this publication can be freely consulted in toto and without charge: http://www.revistaius.com
Readers are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material via any medium or format.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
If you remix, transform or build upon the licensed material, its distribution is not permitted.
Charges for managing articles: Revista IUS will not charge for receiving, processing or publishing articles (Article Processing Charge, or APC) submitted by authors.
